Here I am

Duramax Crankshaft Failures??

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Front End Alignment

Like to post a photo of a blown up IH diesel

amcintyre,

I did not say you flamed anyone, sorry for the confussion. I was refering more to ata. Did not mean it the way your took it. Sorry once again.



ata,

I did not miss the articles in the TDR magazine even though I barly look at it.



But still does not say Exclusive only to Dodge Cummin`s Trucks.


Hence the reason for the General Diesel Forum, and remember I did say that I welcome other brands.



You yourself said that... .

The purpose of the Site is to Parallel the Magazine.




Now let's see if you can follow the way I think of the website, remember this is MY thinking using your words, maybe somebody else's thinking too, not sure.



If the magazine is for Dodge trucks, and the website is to parallel the magazine, then the website is for Dodges.



Does it make since? I am not trying to flame so please to not respond in the manner you did the first time.



Andrew
 
Last edited:
Come on, get serious:

Anybody is welcome here to discuss anything they want about diesels. Just so happens 99. 9 per cent here own CTD. Now if you don't and have another brand, DO NOT expect to be smooth talked or this PC BS here. I think to many of you have be brainwashed by your goverment to believe all thing are created equal. For me I could care less what you drive, but to "get your feeling hurt" , squall and pout is childish. Some here will pamper you but if you consider yourself a man, shut up and act like one. If you can't take a slam on your truck, leave. Just quietly leave and go to a site where your type are. Not to dig you but your feeling don't make a damn to me.



I drive a CTD with 235K miles and when you are at the same milage, come back and let us know what a great truck the Duro-Max is.

Bye now.



. . Preston. .
 
OH Boy

"HERE WE GO AGAIN" :-laf :-laf :-laf :-laf



Man I love it when you guys get started:-{} gives me something to read at work;)



Big D
 
what I am trying to avoid.....

Originally posted by Turbo Thom

Come on, get serious:

Anybody is welcome here to discuss anything they want about diesels. Just so happens 99. 9 per cent here own CTD. Now if you don't and have another brand, DO NOT expect to be smooth talked or this PC BS here. I think to many of you have be brainwashed by your goverment to believe all thing are created equal. For me I could care less what you drive, but to "get your feeling hurt" , squall and pout is childish. Some here will pamper you but if you consider yourself a man, shut up and act like one. If you can't take a slam on your truck, leave. Just quietly leave and go to a site where your type are. Not to dig you but your feeling don't make a damn to me.



I drive a CTD with 235K miles and when you are at the same milage, come back and let us know what a great truck the Duro-Max is.

Bye now.



. . Preston. .



ROTFLMFAO!!!!



Too funny Preston.
 
TDK beat me to it!

I was gonna point out where it said that "The purpose of the Turbo Diesel Register is to give Dodge/Cummins owners more satisfaction in the ownership of their pickup. " Also was gonna mention that the last few mags I've gotten never had any Duramax or PSD features... . Also was gonna say that at the top of pretty much any page it says "The Number One Resource For Dodge/Cummins Turbo Diesel Owners!". Hmm... . doesn't say anything about fair treatment for Duramaxes or PSD's anywhere I've read here :D.



You can drive whatever tickles your fancy-I won't try to talk you out of it. And you can yap at me until you're blue in the face-I'm really good at tuning out information that I feel is of no use to me :). I don't think I was even flaming amcintyre-I just stated that if you want to come into a rival gang's clubhouse and state your opinions be ready for what's gonna come back at you... . If you've got something really nasty/hateful/demeaning to throw at me PM me-and I will give you my phone # and you can blather to me person-to-person.....



Oh, and by the way, MR ata... . , my handle is JHansen-not JHanson... . at least spell it right if you're gonna try to cut me down! But thanks for coming out anyways... .



Jason Hansen
 
Hey amcintyre.....

..... if I came across as nasty in my tone that wasn't really what I intended. PM me, I'll give you my phone #, and we'll chat just to prove I'm really not Neanderthal! :D



Jason
 
Re: Hey amcintyre.....

Originally posted by JHansen

..... if I came across as nasty in my tone that wasn't really what I intended. PM me, I'll give you my phone #, and we'll chat just to prove I'm really not Neanderthal! :D



Jason

I didn't think you did. I understand it a Cummins camp. I don't expect to walk away persuading anyone to trade in your Dodge.

Just trying to have an objective opinion.

MAC
 
As far as other forum I am a member of THE DIESEL PAGE for going on 3 years. Never and I mean never has a thread in 2 years ever had been Started on BS about Dodge. On occasion someone will drag a thread there we all comment about the bull c**p that it is about the Duramax. Some off the members from here have posted there with some great info with tons of respect right back at them.



amcintyre - sorry to burst your bubble but there have been a number of times in the past the the Cummins has been slammed on the dieselpage. I have posted over there in the past and been slammed repeatedly although I tried very hard to remain unbiased. In one case I put a post out there in the war room forum (I don't think that was the name of it, but I don't remember it now and it was deleted some time ago) where I posted my thoughts after test driving a D/A truck. Many of the members over there took my review for what it was and thanked me for it - however there were a few that took any negative comment that I made and blasted at me for it. I also put a post on there at one time warning about a bad fuel incident that I had and was trying to warn other diesel owners about it - I had quite a few guys that blasted at me even on that thread just because I was a Dodge owner and I made no mention of it in my post at all! There was another case where someone went through all the TSB's that had ever been published on the 2nd generation RAM to say how bad it was, I then researched the TSB's on the new Chevy's and found that more TSB's had been released on the new Chevy (1/2 ton & HD's) since the new body style than had been released on the 2nd gen RAM's - I posted that and was blasted there too because I posted all the TSB's for 1/2 ton and HD's for 2 years on the Chevy and on the Dodge's only those for HD's for 11 years (I thought 11 years worth of TSB's on the HD Dodges compared to 2 years of the LD and HD Chevy's should at least be comparable). My point is that on any site there will be some people that will blast away at you if you are from the "other" side.



Now what I have seen on the dieselpage is a great tendency to discount problems that people have had with their trucks because of the past history of the 6. 2 and 6. 5 engines making people gun shy - that is where the VIN # joke comes from on here. A recent example was a guy (can't remember his name) that was having continuing troubles with his allison transmission hotshotting with heavy loads all the time, he was accused of being a Dodge or a Ford owner trying to stir stuff up, people requesting his vin #, etc. There were several hundred posts on there going after that poor guy.



The "tick" problem is a great example, I truly believe that if we had a problem like that on the CTD engines here that we'd have guys working on a solution for the problem even if they had to tear into the engines and redesign stuff to make it work - much like has happened on the Ford Diesel site with the cackle problem. On the dieselpage it seems that GM's line of "it's normal" has been taken hook line and sinker. On the dieselpage site as an outsider it seems that any problems are immediately suspect as a Ford or Dodge owner trying to stir stuff up, and it doesn't take long for calls for them to post a VIN # to prove it. I have never seen a post on the Dodge or Ford sites asking for a VIN # to prove something, people on both sites are taken for their word if they have a problem and people don't get offended that they're trying to insult their trucks by making stuff up. Instead what you see is "post pictures, how do you run your truck, how many miles, etc" so that we can get to the source of the problem and try to come up with a fix for it if D/C doesn't. We certainly have our share of problems that we deal with - but we try hard to deal with them and come up with a solution, lift pumps on 24v trucks are a perfect example. From what I've seen on the dieselpage site I can't say the same over there - although I do have to say that the situation is MUCH MUCH better today than it was 2 years ago when the D/A's were just hitting the streets. Guys over there are getting much more realistic about their trucks today than they were then and realizing that anything made by man has it's faults and it's failures.



I have my issues with the new Chevy HD's, keep in mind that I have owned nothing but Chevy's until I bought my wife's Jeep (great buy) and my Dodge and my family is very vested in GM - both my father and father in law are GM execs. I for one HATE the idea of an IFS front suspension in a 4wd truck - it's cost me way too much over the years because I truly use my truck, off road it, race it, etc. However, I realize that GM is targeting a different market than me - for my market Dodge and Ford fit the bill better. GM's hit the nail on the head for those that want to tow RV's with their 4x4 trucks and will only drive on the road, they have a smooth ride, low step in height, etc. For those of us that off road our trucks (whether that be true off road rock crawling, on the sand dunes, mud, trails, etc or those that are going in and out of construction sites day in and day out) they've missed the mark - we need solid front axles that can withstand a lot of abuse and a lot of ground clearance. Different strokes for different folks! JMHO
 
Mr JHansen I Apologize for spelling your name wrong. I do not think you are a Neanderthal or anything else. But when you said this was a Dodge site only it`s not. Anybody that pays $35. 00 can be here and state or say almost anything they want.

Mr TxDieselKid if you look back at my posts you will not find anywhere that I said this was not a Dodge Site. I said it was not a Dodge Site only. Meaning you could talk Chev-Ford or Dodge. I think about every Diesel made has been talked about here at one time.

Ok I am done and moving on. Everybody have a good day.
 
You are not bursting my bubble. As I said 2 yrs going on 3 yrs there @The Diesel Page. Com . I was not part of the bashing you may have gotten there. There are problems on all forums like these. I know there is some things I might not have seen in the beginning, But as I stated my involvement there I have seen nothing but positive posting and loads of info on the Duramax/Allison . I guess I jumped on at the right time . That being said I am sure you will say the same here. As it was pointed out I lurked here because I have found it interesting reading. In addition my run in with a member here. So I joined. My only reason for objecting here is that like I said NO THREADS over there have ever STARTED like what I have seen here like this one if I am wrong I apologize. I know that some views are not shared by all members here. One of my objectives I feel to get my monies worth is to have the opportunity to give IMHO my views on diesel engine whether it is a Duramax or not. As a paying member to get the same RESPECT as other members. I do remain unbiased. Through all of this nonsense no toilet type here. If someone made such an ironies comment about something you had some interest in would you not want some info? I am not looking to change the way this forum conducts it self, but I will point out the BS and disrespect. I'll bow out of this I've said my peace. I have offered up the truth to the BS comments. With no reply on where in hell are all those spare parts on the road so I can go and pick them up. LOL I answered or gave proof of a high mileage Duramax. I posted a link to the truth on the cranks. I have conducted myself in a respectful manly way (plenty of testosterone here look where I am At. Cummins camp now that takes B**ls) What else can I do. Ask for the same NNNNAAAAAAAA... ... ... ... ... I'll bow out, I get where most of you are coming from. The others with tunnel vision JUST KEEP WALKING TO THE LIGHT... ... .....

LATER GENTS TILL WE TYPE AGAIN AND WE WILL>>>>>>>>>>>>

PS IF YOU HERE OF ANY DURAMAX HEADS ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD LET ME NO SCRAP METAL PRICES ARE RISING !!!!!!!!!!!! LOL


MAC
 
Last edited:
I agree

The guys at Pro Trucks in my area build serious off-road vehicles several of which have been featured in major magazines- they swear by Ford and Dodge because of the base suspensions- the owner has a Chevy dually but had to put a 2 inch body lift in to get it as high as my Dodge- Chevy has a very "car-like" philosophy for its trucks and they are well turned out but IMHO they are on-road only- I wish the Dodge had the fit and finish of the GM product- my beloved 95 Tahoe 4x4 with 142,000 hard miles has seats that look new and the thing ages real well- I do not use it as much now that Big Green goes through deep sand in NC with 50 lbs of air all around!!!!!
 
Well not to get off topic or anything...



I seriously doubt that GM would consider putting a cast crank on the DM. They have been there and done that with -some- of the 5. 7 diesels. To believe that they forgot or ignored that point in light of the deserved reputation they got from it the first time is beyond comprehension.



I am going to have to call bravo sierra on this one unless I can get a broken cast DM crank in my hands.
 
I'm not a "fan" of any particular brand... previous truck was a '64 Ford, went 371,000 miles on 2 engine rebuilds, one transmission and one rear end. Never ran right but nearly always ran.

When it came time to replace it... well, maybe several years after it came time... I looked at 4 brands of truck. The Toyota was the nicest car of the bunch. I could not stand the lousy design Ford had for seatbelts... getting into the back seat on a Ford QC entails an exercise similar to wrestling with an octopus. The Chevy had no diesel, but great expectations. I did not wait on the GM product because I've been around the block and have a memory.

GM has this nasty habit of using customers as paying beta-testers. Well, I guess they all do, but not with GM's consistency. A few examples have already been stated, there are many more. The sad thing is GM seems to finally give up on a product right about the time they have it dialed in. Had I been in the market for a gasser... I don't know, it might wear a bowtie.

Wonder how many miles I can get out of Moby Truck?
 
Here's some posts from the GM site showing the bashing that happens there - all of these are within the last 6 months, btw:



On the '03 Dodges:



Sounds like the marketing folks at Daimler/Chyrsler are staying up nights to hype sales. Their newest spin has the Cummins 5. 9 with 305 hp @ 2900 and 555 ft. lb. torque @1400. No mention of what type of rubber band they will use for a transmission yet.



===========



On the new Powerstrokes:



I just got my Moter Trend truck trends mag with the artical on the Ford Tonka Concept truck, in the article it mentions the power plant as being a 6. 0 litre 350 HP 600 FP torque diesel with ALUMINUM HEADS? Is this a version of the new G2 Powerstroke?



Replies:



From what I've read in other articles it will have cast iron heads.



---------



NO aluminum heads on this engine. The only thing that is aluminum on the head is the top half that holds the rocker arms and fuel rail.

Greg



---------



Negative on the Aluminum heads. Rockers and fuel rail are the only aluminum in the heads.

The numbers posted are correct but they are still claiming to be concept numbers- actual production will/may vary.



=========



another one:



Well I guess they have been having a few of these running for a month or so now on the test stands. I just heard about it late last week. Funning looking engine, and it looks like with all the bolt together peices that oil leaks are going to happen. It is quite but I don't think quiter than a Dmax. Wish I could take pictures to show you all. Of course I will keep you all posted.

Greg



==========



and another one:



Shortly after we started getting some good solid info on the Duramax here in the DP we heard about the "all new Ford powerstroke" from the blue oval news. That was probably well over a year ago and still the only printed information about the G2 I have read besides forum talk.

Seems like Ford guys dont like disgussing the similarities with the G2 and the Dmax but it seems obvious where they got a good portion of their new design.



So from where I sit it appears that Ford saw the Dmax, slapped one of their own together and promised to begin producing them and thats been the last we heard, although some forum talk Ive seen also leads me to believe that they have posponed the promise of a camless design and are now proposing to use that technology a couple years after the G2s introduction.



Did Ford bite off more than they could chew when they promised their new PSD? Has anyone heard "anything"?



----------



reply:



Well the G2 can't be any good. Lightweight diesel? In a big Ford. Can't be. How are they gonna make it light and powerful?

Sounds just like the Dmax that kicks the big old PSD's butt. Navistar is copying GM/Isuzu's philosophy.



----------





A local guy posting on the dieselpage site:



know there a few around here who are really bent on bashing Ford's and Dodges, but I don't get it. There are things I like about all the big three. I don't feel the need to go around bashing what everybody else has.



===========



Miscellaneous:



beside i'm going to be able to kick the crap out of dodges and fords o right we can already do this haha Dan



------------



I can't imagine what kind of ticks and rattles are going on in Dodges and Fords that are covered up by the god-awful noise they produce. I think maybe the truck is too quiet?



------------



The only comment that I have about this Ford Dodge, GM word slingin game is this. The "Other Guys" are jealous at this time



------------











Here's a post from the guy that I talked about above that had problems with his D/A and guys were asking for VIN #'s - this post was LOCKED on the dieselpage site btw:



I hope most of you guys are having MUCH better luck with your trucks that I. Mine has been a nightmare. From the day it was delivered with a leaking, wrongfully clamped, lower radiator hose to this morning when it ran for about a minute. Then it would crank but not start. It is Sunday and I was 120 miles from home. I had to borrow a car and will have to deal with it tomorrow. I am so sick of this pile of junk. Here is the rest of my problem with the truck, it wont pull my big loads in fifth, it runs 3000rpm and gets 5mpg. Nothing short of a factory trans reprogram is going to fix it, such a fix does not exist. I have over maintained this truck, it really fries my butt when this happens. The speakers are shot at 30k miles. The drivers seat padding is already shot. I spent $400 on mirrors because GM couldn't provide a decent power set for towing. The original tires only lasted 20k miles. Need I continue? This truck was the biggest waste of 40 grand I can think of. NEVER, NEVER again. I kick myself when I look at the 99 powerstroke I own. It has over 150k hard miles on it and NEVER left me stranded. The seats are better, the mirrors work from the factory, the original tires went 50k, the less powerful truck with one less ratio in its trans pulls BETTER. Same tires, same rear end ratio, same rpm at 70mph. End rant, I have learned an expensive mistake. I just thought it prudent to share with potential buyers.



=============



Here's another one that got blasted on the dieselpage:



To all of those who have experienced one of the GM newest and latest technological wonders, good riddens! I have experienced nothing but headaches from the order process to the incompentent mech shop to the GM GIANT who is still sleeping when it comes to the customer. Shift bussiness drives me nuts, can't use cruise control, mpg is lousy, had 6. 5 turbo got better and the power isnt all what GM makes it out to be. Expecially for the price tag of the truck. I also will say wheels body trim and creature comforts are minimal at best and if you dont believe me take a look at Ford. Bottom line , can you say FREIGHTLINER if you want to drive in a mans world get a mans truck. All of you guys have been a wealth of info and I thank you for that, and so has this site! MULE POWER



=============



I could come up with a lot more and ESPECIALLY if the "battle zone" forum was still up - but all those posts were deleted, but I think this gives a good picture that bashing happens on all the sites.
 
I seen that last one

Steve, I read that last one on the Diesel Page but it didn't stay there very long. :rolleyes: I have a buddy with a 4x4 regular cab 2500 Cheby it has a 6spd in it and he is in love with the truck. (sounds familiar);) I had a chance to drive it a couple of times and it is a nice truck. The only thing I didn't like was the uncomfortable seats:( you can't hardly recline them at all and they sit really low and make it hard for me to see out. It does run pretty good though and sounds pretty good now that we put his strait pipe on. :D I think Cheby has a really good truck for thier segment of the market, now all they have to do is build a truck for the real truck buyers and then they might have something. :--)



Here is one for you Cheby boys. When are they going to put the DMax in the Suburbans?:confused: I would really like to have one of those. :cool:



Later

Big D
 
Back
Top