As with all things there is a trade off. By adding one of these units and needing to crack the water with electricity, you will be adding a load to the engine. The question is does the load added = or is it > than the benifit gained.
If you lose mileage then obviously the load is too great, but on the other hand if you are gaining mileage, then the output of the process is greater than the additional load put on the engine.
By adding another alternator, you are adding a load to the engine. Claims have been made by some that this process is down to just a few amps and in the case of the fellow that was supposidly killed, down to 1/2 of an amp.
It is an interesting idea that has been around for a long time. If we could generate more hydrogen output, say 3 times the output over the input of 1/2 amp of power used, you then have the ability to run nothing but hydrogen and not have to worry about fuel at all. Just add water
It looks like frequency and radio waves are applied are a key to efficiency to this process. Find that key and you crack the efficiency code. Problem is, will big oil allow you to do this.
We all hear the myths, rumors and legends. Myths, rumors and legends all have a starting point that is usually murky and obscured. The question then become is it murky and obscured by design of those who want to keep secrets or is it truly a myth, rumor or legend.
Well I have rattle on long enough. Break down water and you can burn the two gases, oxygen and hydrogen.
Inject water and methanol and what you are doing is displacing volumn with the water and methanol vapor which is not a gas, but a vapor.
We just have to understand which one is more efficient and TAX FREE
If everyone could burn water, GOVY would then figure out another way to tax us.
I will be getting one of these system to tinker with after the first of the year. Gives me something to do in my old age. :-laf
Food for thought and more food for thought.
