Then that is your opinion which you are entitled to, but the way you said it this reader could interpret it as fact, which it is not.
I wish these discussions would get more in line with "how" the transmission is expected to perform, rather than this company is #1. I think the person asking the questions would get much more out of it.
IMO
Tight converters make chargers harder to light (increased lag) but once on boost feel great. They also require less lock-up surface area because those materials are under less strain when engaging (less rpm to recover). They also work nice with N2O IMO. They also generate more heat while stopped and in gear, and create more of a "push" on the brakes.
Loose converters allow rpm which reduces lag, but also less movement and will generate more heat when accelerating in fluid mode. These converters are harder on lock-up clutch material because they recover so much rpm when engaging. They generate less heat while stopped and in gear and less push on the brakes.
Somewhere in between is what I like and that is what I have. I don't want real tight, and I don't want stock either. Because I like some rpm in fluid mode, I believe it's best to have a billet cover on the TC and triple lock up disk. This has proven to make my transmission reliable for daily, towing, and strip use. Works great in stop and go traffic which Atlanta is famous for. My choice was just what I needed.
Valvebody set-ups also make or break a unit as far as what you feel. some like hard shifts, some don't. But if you ride in a truck that shifts hard and don't like it, don't think all of them are that way. Tell the transmission vendor what you want/expect.
So when you are test driving what you want, not only ask who's transmission, but also what level is the converter and so on. Make sure you purchase what fits your needs and wants and you'll most likely be happy with your selection.
Good luck!