I'm not sure what you were attempting to say. You both adopted my agument as your own and attempted again to refute it.
I repeat my earlier statement. V8 diesels used in light truck applications are throw away engines. Cummins ISBs are not. They provide very long service as new and can easily and cheaply be freshened up or rebuilt.
Furd 7. 3s, 6. ohhs, 6. 4s, and now 6. 7s are not now and never were medium duty engines. Look at the engine tag and you will clearly see light duty. Not even Furd or obama motors ever claimed their engines were medium duty.
Neither is a Furd F-450 a medium duty truck.
i could not find the engine tag, but on the door the 450 says it is medium duty, i took a pic and can upload it if you would like me too. i could not find the engine tag saying it was medium duty, however here in cali the truck is currently exempt from the new smog laws becaue it is medium duty truck, with a medium duty engine.
I cant see Cummins making a special engine just for Chrysler.
Now, maybe some earlier engine parts are different, but for Cummins to re design an Chrysler specific power plant? No way.
actually just about every manufacturer has application specific parts for every engine, thats what the cpl or critical parts list number is for. the cummins alone has different critical parts for marine apps vs fl60(medium duty) and the dodge app, even inside that the cpl's will differ based on power ratings, duty cyle, and other considerations.
i have never seen one but have seen credible evidence (cited books) that eventhe chev 350 and other such gasser blocks, back in their glory days had different, heavier, blocks for their marine apps vs car apps. i dont know that for fact but it could be true. i do know for a fact about diesels though, the blocks maybe the same, but many of the parts are different and sometimes significantly heavier.
There's really nothing magic about a 120 degree bank angle for a V-6 over a 90 degree for a V-8, a 72 degree for a V-10, a 60 degree for a V-12, or a 45 degree for a V-16. A desirable bank angle is generally calculated as 720 degrees divided by the number of cylinders. Even at that, most V-6 engines that aren't made on V-8 assembly lines use a 60 degree compromise bank angle as the 120 degree would be too wide for many applications.
Having said that, as far as non-inline engines are concerned, an engine using a 180 degree bank angle (a flat or boxer engine) would conceptually be optimum as secondary balance forces from the 2 banks would tend to cancel each other out.
Rusty
rusty im not arguing your point, but i have heard something similar to ah64, truthfully i think both of you are saying the same things just in different words, more maybe you are talking about parellel ideas that have not been lined up yet. also i believe you are right about the opposed engines, they tand to produce a lot of bottom end torque and do well with rpm as well, all due to good natural balance.
I heard of a few of them that ran 400k miles as RV transport trucks but even the engine data plate did NOT claim they were medium duty motors. They had connecting rods, bearings, and crank journals very similar in size and structure to small block Chevy gas motors.
I say again, Navistar 7. 3 engines compared with Cummins inline six diesels only in that both burned diesel fuel.
harvey, the similarity of the internal components of a diesel v8 and a gas v8 is due to packaging. you cant have 7 main bearings and individual rod bearings on each crank throw in a v8, its not possible, that does not mean its not considered heavy duty. as for a reliabliaty is concerned thats more proper design (or lack thereof) and maintenence than anything else.
3208... can we just forget about that engine... what a slug...
yes, the D-9R ran a 3408, the D-10R ran a 3412, and the D-11R ran a 3508... If memory serves me, the D10R engine on the dyno would produce just about 700hp... the 3508 in the D-11R was the same as the 992G, about 1000hp.
The new D9T runs a C series inline 6. . can remember which, if its a C-15 or C-18, the new D10T runs a C-27... .
wingate, have you seen the 3208 in marine app? i dont think slug is a fitting word for it. the 3208 was really a poorly misunderstood engine, it was a dog in on highway apps, machine world it did ok, but in marine world it was a runner, @ 1100hp i think not many would say otherwise. as far as reliable goes i have not dealt with them enough to say, i have heard a lot of good and bad on those engines. the place i used to work at, an employee had a marine spec 3208 in a chev 2500, there is a pic of him in the parking lot with smoke rolling off all 4 tires, that was a off pure acceleration. nothing to aid in spinning the tires.
I bought a used '82 Olds 88 w/350 "diesel". It was a beautiful loaded car w/30k miles. 70% off sticker price. How bad could it be? Every week something new failed of it. When the glow plug relay stuck and they all burned out, that was enough. I dropped in a gas 350 from the junk yard and sold it, then bought my first Toyota and have driven them ever since. My dad always drove Olds and I carried on the the tradition, until I got conned with that POS. It definitely was not my dad's Oldsmobile.
those old chevy diesels sucked, the blocks were simply not strong enough to handle a diesel's compression. i have to say though i have never heard about too many base engine problems, it was more the add on stuff. i. e. fuel system, electrical, and gaskets and seals. it is an engine i have not done much with though, so i cant really speak to that much.