JRichard said:
Okay, i think it's time people got back to the basics and stopped attacking other peoples character on the basis of what they think is "cool", just because someone likes the look of a great big cloud of soot from a diesel pickup doesn't mean that they're an evil person bent on destroying the environment and those who are trying to preserve it. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but check the character slurs at the front door - please.
From SNOKING:
"NO, this juvenile does not even want to drive down the road. "
From Hohn:
"Give it up and quit posing. "
It's not just from this post, but from other posts with people who are attacking other members (and non members) characters unfoundedly.
If i was an admin on this site, i would definitley get involved in this as it seems to be getting out of hand to me. It seems to me, if the main reason you are posting in reply to a thread is to try to "bash" someone, then you should probably not hit the submit button.
All things aside, everyone involved has a point, especially in this topic, and a right to discuss that point, the attacking is what is an issue here. Before i get any flaming replys from anyone, the answer is YES i read this entire thread front to back, every letter of every post, and im NOT missing the point.
Just my whoppin . 02
/rant off
Jake
Character slurs? Hardly. I will ALWAYS reserve the right to criticize someone's judgment-- just as THEY should always reserve the right to criticize MINE. It's only fair-- you have to take it if you're gong to give it.
Character and judgment are not the same thing, imo. Though I tend to think that someone with good character usually exercises good judgment.
So let's deal with this ridiculous assertion that just because someone's idea of "cool" is different, we aren't allowed to render judgment on that position. I don't buy the BS that "all opinions are valid", because it's simply not true. An opinion backed up with logic and evidence is MUCH more valid.
There are some kids in my neighborhood that think it's cool to spray paint graffiti on people's brand new wood fencing. But the law says otherwise-- the law says it's not cool, it's CRIMINAL. Now, is the LAW being too harsh on these kids, just because they have a different idea of what "cool" is? Is it being too "judgmental"??
Maybe we should call in a moderator to help out the poor kids who are being victimized here?
"Oh," you say, "it's different, as these kids were breaking the law. Hardly the same as making your truck intentionally smoke. "
Really? Perhaps you should bone up on the EPA fines for tampering with emission systems on vehicles?
So, since we are all adults, and mature and can handle a little criticism without :{ :{ , there's no need to bawl to a moderator when someone gets their feelings hurt.
If I come on here an post about how I want to do something that shows poor judgment and/or immaturity, I have no reasonable expectation of avoiding criticism.
See my post entitled "Guys, I want to swap out my CTD for a smogged 318-- what do YOU think"?
Or my post entitled "I knocked up 4 different women and now can't afford the child support after maxing out my credit cards for BOMB money-- what should I do?"
Actions have consequences. If you aren't prepared for the consequences, don't do the action.
Posting in a public forum is an action that MAY expose you to criticism. Be prepared.
I'm fully expecting the criticism of others to follow this post. If I am wrong, make your case. Nothing wrong with friendly debate, as it makes us ALL sharper if we approach it properly.
