Brother Greg
Don't know if you've seen this Forum but Alex (Boss) has been in it a lot since he got his 6.5 tuned up and shooting like it could, I and others told him he just had to spend time dialing it in load wise, and ive told you about his shooting history.
http://www.65grendel.com/forum/
I have never put much stock in the ballistic charts that are put out by the bullet and powder manufactures as anything more than a guide to START your reloading for WHAT EVER round that it is your playing with. I do use them as a I WONT GO OVER THE MAX LISTED, I think that the people that build weapons and know what pressures they can withstand are far smarter than I. We all know the signs of pressure, not all weapons are the same so whats hot in one may not be hot in another.
IMO I don't think that the printed data is tested as much as some people are led to believe. IMO I think that they use instrumentation to attain the MV and maybe out at 100 yards (if that) the rest is just a mathematical equation to achieve a THOUGHT TO BE bullet speed, energy, and bullet drop at further distances, and probably is pretty close to being the actual thing.
It would take some pretty serious shooting and instruments to get the printed data any other way than a mathematical formula result, not to include the place that the shooting is taking place. It would have to be EXACTLY the same from shot to shot to say unequivocally that the printed info is the Holy Grail of the round.
This being said you can take rounds that are almost identical in Velocity, energy, drop and make a GUESS as to which one is best, I have always believed in, Seeing is Believing. The animals that were hit with the 6.5 made a real impression on me its accurate in an AR based weapon, range was MORE that satisfactory with shots in the 600 yard range. Those two factors would be, what parts were used in the build to attain the accuracy, and the ability of the shooter.
The last one (ability of the shooter) is the one that is the most important in REAL WORLD shooting, anyone can buy a accurate rifle but not everyone is a shooter. Laying a gun on a bench and poking holes in paper at known distances in a somewhat controlled environment is not all that impressive to me, take an open field shot at moving targets at various ranges being guesstimated on the fly by the one pulling the trigger, THAT'S SHOOTING.
So if we are looking at rounds that are ALMOST the same in the real world ALMOST ain't making it, the 243 Win Short maybe!! better but by how much? its surely not going to make a better shooter out of ya, because your shooting one vs the other. We have this very conversation in Hunt camp EVERY YEAR, it gets old to me and I usually go have a better conversation with the livestock. One will talk about the GREATNESS of the 300 WIZZ BANG vs the faster speed of the 7MM BUTT BUSTER the game isn't going to know that it was killed with a bullet that's going drop an inch more and is a 150 FPS slower IMO
DEAD IS DEAD!!
Don't know if you've seen this Forum but Alex (Boss) has been in it a lot since he got his 6.5 tuned up and shooting like it could, I and others told him he just had to spend time dialing it in load wise, and ive told you about his shooting history.
http://www.65grendel.com/forum/
I have never put much stock in the ballistic charts that are put out by the bullet and powder manufactures as anything more than a guide to START your reloading for WHAT EVER round that it is your playing with. I do use them as a I WONT GO OVER THE MAX LISTED, I think that the people that build weapons and know what pressures they can withstand are far smarter than I. We all know the signs of pressure, not all weapons are the same so whats hot in one may not be hot in another.
IMO I don't think that the printed data is tested as much as some people are led to believe. IMO I think that they use instrumentation to attain the MV and maybe out at 100 yards (if that) the rest is just a mathematical equation to achieve a THOUGHT TO BE bullet speed, energy, and bullet drop at further distances, and probably is pretty close to being the actual thing.
It would take some pretty serious shooting and instruments to get the printed data any other way than a mathematical formula result, not to include the place that the shooting is taking place. It would have to be EXACTLY the same from shot to shot to say unequivocally that the printed info is the Holy Grail of the round.
This being said you can take rounds that are almost identical in Velocity, energy, drop and make a GUESS as to which one is best, I have always believed in, Seeing is Believing. The animals that were hit with the 6.5 made a real impression on me its accurate in an AR based weapon, range was MORE that satisfactory with shots in the 600 yard range. Those two factors would be, what parts were used in the build to attain the accuracy, and the ability of the shooter.
The last one (ability of the shooter) is the one that is the most important in REAL WORLD shooting, anyone can buy a accurate rifle but not everyone is a shooter. Laying a gun on a bench and poking holes in paper at known distances in a somewhat controlled environment is not all that impressive to me, take an open field shot at moving targets at various ranges being guesstimated on the fly by the one pulling the trigger, THAT'S SHOOTING.
So if we are looking at rounds that are ALMOST the same in the real world ALMOST ain't making it, the 243 Win Short maybe!! better but by how much? its surely not going to make a better shooter out of ya, because your shooting one vs the other. We have this very conversation in Hunt camp EVERY YEAR, it gets old to me and I usually go have a better conversation with the livestock. One will talk about the GREATNESS of the 300 WIZZ BANG vs the faster speed of the 7MM BUTT BUSTER the game isn't going to know that it was killed with a bullet that's going drop an inch more and is a 150 FPS slower IMO
DEAD IS DEAD!!

Last edited: