Exactly.
The fact that BD only rates their twins at 500hp says a lot about BD, and even more about the "other" twins guys.
Dyno hp may fail to be sustainable in actual usage.
Just for fun, wouldn't it be cool to have a dyno cell where you could change the weather in the cell? You want a dry 115°? NO prob-- dial it up. You want a Soggy, miserable 90° and 90% humidity? DONE! Finally, for the creme de la creme, you could CHANGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE. That's right-- a dyno that can make your truck think it's pulling a grade at 8K elevation-- and climbing!
Back to twins, though. My limited experience on this leads me to believe that "dyno hp" and "sustainable hp" are worlds apart. Just as an example, I'll mention the contrasts between when I dynoed on a DJ248C (intertial) and a Superflow eddy current dyno.
On the DJ, I hit 390hp, 918 lb-ft, "corrected" (yeah right) with just DD2s and an EZ. EGT never passed 1300.
On the superflow, I hit 349. 9hp, 908lb-ft "corrected" (again, whatever), with the same combo. However-- EGTs were SCREAMING-- they hit every bit of 1550 and then some.
So while I was putting down the close to the same power, the EGTs tell the story. I could sustain the dynojet hp all day long. On the Superflow, though, anything more than just a short moment would be guaranteed meltdown. Yet, the SF measure LESS hp!!!
Maybe we should update that old saying to say something to the effect of: "Dynos lie, and liars dyno. " Uh oh-- here come the flames!
All this just to say that it's not so much the dyno that is at fault-- it's our incorrect assumption that the dyno reflects the sustainable HP you have at the wheels.
There's a reason that Top Fuel cars have 7000+hp, while endurance racing cars rarely have more than 700 or so. Why? Because A Top Fuel engine is a controlled, slow-motion disintegration/detonation. The engine is practically spent after every run. Similarly, NASCAR engines built for qualifying are different than those built for the actual race (when allowed), because the HP/endurance needs are different.
Now, we bring this full circle and see that the amount of useable HP you can build into the engine is inversely related to the amount of HP you intend to use. In other words, the guy who runs empty all the time can build in a lot more HP than can the guy who tows every day. Less still for the guy who tows HEAVY all the time.
When you talk about sustaining a certain output of HP, the allowable limit goes down quite a bit. Heck, if you could sustain 600hp out of a 5. 9, why would Cummins bother with ISXs?
The truth is that it's pretty easy to build a 5. 9 to easily tow any legal weight up any paved road in America at any legal speed. Doing that indefinitely is a different story.
BD rates their twins at 500hp, but I'm guessing they could support 650+ of "dyno power".
That said, technology moves on, and I would LOVE for the PS66 to raise the bar for single chargers.
But everytime a single charger raises the bar for singles, it ALSO raises the bar just that much higher for twins, to the point where singles CANNOT pass twins.
JMAO, again