Here I am

Factory brake controller

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Trans pan? yes or no? ATS Thermal block?

Whoo-Whoo coming

Status
Not open for further replies.
You’re not getting the whole picture. If it was a faulty connection the voltage wouldn’t increase when exceeding approximately 30 mph. If you had read my 1st post you’d know I’ve been through this top to bottom. You’re not changing factory programming of the ITBM.
Sorry, not intending to offend you. I actually did read your post I see these trucks as complex data networks and infrastructure, not just components and wires. It could be its crap and nothing will help. I've just seen, experienced and solved complex problems. And when referring to faulty connections, not necessarily absolute or glaring. In the data automation world, read as servers, routers, firewalls, it's not uncommon when a difficult problem occurs, we call it reseating the connectors. And I posted the factory troubleshooting procedure and yet to have seen anyone say they ran it. Just trying to help.

Good luck figuring it out.

Out,

Ron
 
Last edited:
I know you’re trying to help, and it’s laudable. If the search function worked better you could see the test procedure I went through after getting the runaround from the dealer and FCA years ago. Everyone who has complained and followed my procedure has gotten the same results. I ran the trailer connected to the bed plug, with a dvom connected to the bumper plug. Had a man in the right seat recording voltages at various speeds when applying the brakes. All results were consistent and repeatable. The controller pulls voltage out as the vehicle slows. Generally below 30 mph it’s only 7.4 volts at best. That’s why you can’t lock the trailer with the manual lever in a parking lot test. I know it’s hard to understand how the engineers could be so stupid but they obviously haven’t ever towed anything coming close to the trucks capacity.
 
I know you’re trying to help, and it’s laudable. If the search function worked better you could see the test procedure I went through after getting the runaround from the dealer and FCA years ago. Everyone who has complained and followed my procedure has gotten the same results. I ran the trailer connected to the bed plug, with a dvom connected to the bumper plug. Had a man in the right seat recording voltages at various speeds when applying the brakes. All results were consistent and repeatable. The controller pulls voltage out as the vehicle slows. Generally below 30 mph it’s only 7.4 volts at best. That’s why you can’t lock the trailer with the manual lever in a parking lot test. I know it’s hard to understand how the engineers could be so stupid but they obviously haven’t ever towed anything coming close to the trucks capacity.

I'm frustrated for you and despite telling myself to let it go, here I am again. My problems are I'm a persistent type A, I'm laid up for 12 weeks (2 weeks into it) in bed from surgery, and I'm bored to death. Also, you're right about not getting many hits on the TDR website on the ITBC and problems. Going to Google it on WWW and see what hits come up.

Is this a fair summary of your problem?
- Failure of the ITBC to satisfactorily stop your trailers, especially at low speed?
- You've had the ITBC problem since the truck was new (2015)?
- You've turned the truck into the dealer several times and they could not fix?
- Did you elevate a claim to FCA and go to arbitration?
- You've conducted extensive testing on the truck and trailer, concluding the problem is with the truck?
- The truck ITBC voltage output range is 7.4 VDC to ~11 VDC pre your testing?
- Do you know min voltage needed to lock up your trailer brakes at low speed?
- There is nothing more that can be done to improve your situation, without some fix, patch or software/hardware update from FCA?

Overall facts as I see them:
- Some folks are having legitimate problems with their ITBCs
- Many folks are not having any problems with their ITBCs
- There has been extensive analog testing accomplished on the ITBCs
- The folks who have problems with their ITBCs have not been able to resolve them
- No apparent solution at hand

Do I believe you and some folks are having problems with their ITBCs, YES!. But because there are so many of us who are towing heavy with ours, leads me to believe this is not a design problem. Otherwise, all of us would be experiencing it. I believe about all of the analog testing possible has been accomplished. But because there are so many of us who are towing heavy with ours without problems, leads me to believe this is not a design problem. Otherwise, all of us would be experiencing it. So what does that mean, at least to me? There is a complex problem with the truck, in my opinion likely within the truck's data network.

Yesterday, I went back into the FCA Service Manual and found the ITBC is connected to the truck's CAN C BUS via dedicated twisted pair data circuits, like a dedicated Ethernet network. Ethernet network twisted pair wiring is extremely sensitive to the number of twists per inch, precise termination, spotless clean connections. And in the real world, the way to test and certify is special data test equipment the transmits and receives data streams and measures data loss. Ethernet, if that is a fair comparison the Ram truck, is very sensitive to interference, induction, and voltage induced noise. It's likely the trucks twisted pair circuits are shielded and the sheath is grounded to a dedicated isolated ground. I doubt any existing

So, what does this mean in my opinion? Its plausible a few folks may be having ITBC problems related to the truck's network problems. What are the options, again, in my opinion:
- Live with the problem; possible risk of an accident.
- Elevate complaint to FCA and consider NTSB to seek FCA fix
- Install an aftermarket brake controller and dedicated trailer brake wiring to bypass truck ITBC and wiring entirely
- Try unconventional troubleshooting steps that may not work: reseat connectors with dielectric grease, check, clean, tighten grounds with dielectric grease, and inspect cables for nicks or damage.

Finally, I'm not a master IT tech, although I have moderate IT skills, but I had tech controllers, field engineers, EEs, and sys admin available support solving complex data problems on government systems in the past. I'm still ready to help and will continue to learn the ITBC in the background.
BTW, you're not alone dealing with complex and potentially dangerous issues: my 5er is in the shop for a "complex" problem that the Lippert auto level system collapses front landing gear after several weeks of sitting, no leaks found by service dept. I've had problems with the Lippert Auto level system entire time of ownership, dropping while driving, collapsing while parked. 2017 Ram in the shop to try to activate guidelines on the factory backup camera, option which is disabled by FCA. I persist!

Cheers,

Ron
 
Wiredawg, you’ve summed up the problem. The real question is what’s your definition of heavy. My trailer will lock the wheels at 10K at 5 mph with the controller at max . Unfortunately it grosses almost double that. At that weight 7.4 volts doesn’t cut it. I’d be very interested to get voltage readings from all the people who claim to have no problem. Especially since the Ford and GM trucks put 12 volts to the trailer no matter what the speed.
 
mine weighs 21.2Klbs, so I think its heavy. My truck weigh almost 11.6K lbs.

I've really put it through the test last year hitting NM, AZ, CA, OR, WA, MT, ID WY, UT, CO, interstates and some of the steepest grades in the US.

Even though I dont have a problem with mine, I'd like to baseline voltages on a few trucks whose owners aren't experiencing problems to do some comparative analysis.

Been looking on line for a mobile voltage data logger reasonable priced to hook to my truck
When you did your tests, did you hook VOM to wires running to brake voltage and ground. Then had someone record info as you ran the tests?

There are some others on TDR who tow very heavy, Cummins12V98, Newsa, RVTRKN, and others who might help with this.

Anyway, it'll be a long time before I can. I'm curious to locate these different modules and see the wiring, cable looms, and connectors.

I'll continue to share what I find.

Cheers, Ron
 
This is an interesting and no matter IBTC or add on, an important one for anyone that tows.

Here's a question I like to see an answer for, and I did try a search but too many opinions across the web.

What is the signal/power that a magnetic drum brake sees, it has to be an industry standard somewhere. And I bet it's directly linked to a 12VDC neg ground signal/power that an electromagnet works with. And add that a common drum brake magnet has about 3-4 ohms resistance.

Now in my case a MB controller, Hydrastar 1600 actuator and Dexter 4 piston discs. Does the EOH actuator need the same signal + power that magnetic brakes needs? I'm betting not. So diagnostics and required signal for an EOH system at least the Hydrastar soesn't get its operational power from the 7 way brake line circuit itself. The power to operate comes from a direct to trailer battery or breakaway battery kit operates the pump and a control signal comes from the controller.

In the last two months I've had the chance to pull an Airstream with new Self Adjusting Dexter 12" drums and my own Airstream with the Dexter 4 piston discs.

Here's what I saw on the MaxBrake display when connected to the drum brakes, it displayed the AMPERAGE to the brakes but on my EOH, I've never seen that display, ever. That's why I'm theorizing that drum brakes get voltage plus operating current to operate and EOH only sends a control voltage signal to the actuator.

Now, back to the OP's issue there have been a bunch of great ideas presented and I'd really like to know what the resistance value is in Ohms measured between trailer chassis ground and the trailer 7 way plug brake connection.

Good discussion folks, I like it.

And I just came back from towing my 30' Airstream with Dexter discs from SC to eastern TN and back this weekend. It was only a 6% mile long grade coming home but lots of curves and hills on I-40 from NC to TN. Those brakes were spot on. Truck and trailer working as a team.

Gary
 
Gary,
I think I found the book answer to your question about voltage and current (amps) on pages 20 and 21 in the attached
Dexter-Manual-V-A-Measurement.JPG

Dexter-Manual-Amp-Chart.JPG

Dexter-Controller-Comment.JPG

Is this testing and spec info you are talking about?

Cheers, Ron
 
Ron,

That's good test info but my biggest curiosity is vehicle and trailer testing as a rig.

I actually built in inline live 7 way based test rig for brake circuit voltage and amperage. It has the capability, as yet untested of even being hooked up and a co-pilot possibly monitoring the amps and voltage. Full 7 way setup. It tests all magnets for amperage LIVE using your wiring and all connections. We hooked it up Friday in camp on a magnetic brakes AS with 6.7L Ford IBTC. I'm pretty comfortable with basic DC stuff, not PWM and fancy high tech, sorry. So it has the ability to monitor while driving rather than stationary and a software saying why give it all or any braking, if we're not moving?

But what i think is sorta missing is the brakes need this, controller does this standard data.

I'm not going to say one series of data points makes a complete book.

I have a gut feeling that until a driver feels what real braking is, they are possibly in a false sense of security, no problems, my brakes are fine. So challenging brake performance like our OP is a real good thing.

That chart above confirms data from elsewhere and goes right back to Ohms Law.

Thanks,

Gary
 
That’s heavy. I did a little research and found the part number for the ITBM on 17 and uptrucks has changed. It’s also been superseded at least twice. I wonder why?
 
I'm guessing improvements. I actually found them for sale on Amazon for $235. Very interesting indeed. I wonder if there is a correlation of problems with model years. Once purchased and installed, I'm reading the dealer has to flash them. I wonder if a later model would work on an earlier truck. I'm looking at schematic to understand the circuitry. Good catch. Next I'm looking at TSBs to see if there are any related to the ITBC.

Ron
 
Who has an O-scope. Without one you can not see or understand the pulses sent to the brakes. I would like to see the pulse width comparison between EH and EOH. Depending on the meter used the voltage reading of the pulses could vary. Is the meter reading peaks or averaging the reading of peaks and valleys. My guess is the peaks are around 12V, the lower voltage because the meter is averaging the reading.

As a side note the led lights on the new RAM's are also controlled by pulse width modulation.

SnoKing
 
Last edited:
John(?),
have you seen or had this?
08-082-16
10/18/16
’15-’16 DP/DD/
D2/DJ/DS
Integrated Trailer Brake Module Software Enhancement Software Flash
This bulletin applies to vehicles built on or before April 13, 2016, equipped with Trailer Brake Control
(Sales Code XHC). The customer may describe an intermittent condition where the trailer brakes
feel as if they are not working for the first few brake applies. This condition only happens if the trailer
has been connected before the vehicle was started.
If the customer describes the symptom/condition listed above, the correct repair procedure is a
flash/update to the truck’s Integrated Trailer Brake Control Module (ITBM).

Not exactly your problem, but curious if you have it.
Ron
 
copy. Wonder if the pot switch (manual brake switch) and maybe a little more agressive brake matrix?

worth checking. When I recover, might check ITBC on my wifes 2019 1500. I remember when I towed enclosed car hauler, it was too aggressive at first.

Ron
 
Last edited:
Who has an O-scope. Without one you can not see or understand the pulses sent to the brakes. I would like to see the pulse width comparison between EH and EOH. Depending on the meter used the voltage reading of the pulses could vary. Is the meter reading peaks or averaging the reading of peaks and valleys. My guess is the peaks are around 12V, the lower voltage because the meter is averaging the reading.

As a side note the led lights on the new RAM's are also controlled by pulse width modulation.

SnoKing

Are you wondering about the voltage peaks or the frequency of the pulse?

My understanding of it is the voltage peaks should be battery voltage and the pulse is what reduces the seen voltage on a VOM. A lot of better quality VOM (Fluke for example) have frequency meters on them - that would help. Unless you are wanting to actually see the wave itself.
 
I am not wondering about anything. I understand how PWM works and how RMS or other type meters work, most do not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top