Now *I* am getting confused as well - it SOUNDS like Lee, and Wayne, are claiming that soot ppm measures in oil analysis will be LOWER by the simple act if encouraging MORE but SMALLER soot particles...
SEEMS to ME, that the actual SOOT CONTENT and percentages will be the SAME, as far as actual volume is concerned, only that the individual particle sizes will be different!
SORTA like the guy ordering pizza - and when the waiter aked if he wanted the pizza cut into 4 or 6 slices, te guy sez "better cut it into 4 slices, I don't think I can eat 6"...
ALSO, wonder why it's considered BETTER for soot particles to be "individually suspended" in the lubricant at under 1 micron sizes, and continue to circulate, rather than encouraging it to bond with other soot particles and then be filtered OUT of the oil by an efficient filter? I know *I* would rather take steps to have it REMOVED, than encourage it to remain, regardless of size...

SEEMS to ME, that the actual SOOT CONTENT and percentages will be the SAME, as far as actual volume is concerned, only that the individual particle sizes will be different!
SORTA like the guy ordering pizza - and when the waiter aked if he wanted the pizza cut into 4 or 6 slices, te guy sez "better cut it into 4 slices, I don't think I can eat 6"...

ALSO, wonder why it's considered BETTER for soot particles to be "individually suspended" in the lubricant at under 1 micron sizes, and continue to circulate, rather than encouraging it to bond with other soot particles and then be filtered OUT of the oil by an efficient filter? I know *I* would rather take steps to have it REMOVED, than encourage it to remain, regardless of size...

