Turbocharger drive pressure vs. boost
This may be a bit confusing at first. But, I'm posting this here because it is potentially very useful information for anyone thinking of making power modifications to their truck.
These results are based on measurements I took from the stock H1C turbo with a Banks 14cm wastegated exhaust housing. From 0 - 20 psi boost, the drive/boost pressure ratio stayed just about 1:1. At 22psi, drive pressure was 25psi. At 24psi, drive pressure was 30psi. Couldn't get a drive pressure reading above 30psi because that was the limit of the gauge I was using. When increasing boost from 0-20psi, the EGT rose slowly and steadily from 300 to 750. When going from 20-26psi, EGT rose much faster going from 750-1200 in just a couple of seconds.
This is a delicate balance that is very much dependent on the efficiency range of the compressor (the cold side of the turbo that acutally pressurizes the air). This can't really be changed without changing or modifying the compressor. It appears that when staying within the compressor's efficiency range it will produce cool boost and and a drive/boost pressure ratio of about 1:1. When you start to fuel the engine and produce boost and exhaust gas volume that exceed the efficiency of the turbo, the drive/boost pressure ratio will start to shoot up along with your EGT. Compensations can be made by changing the exhaust housing of the turbo to keep the boost and drive pressures in check. Boils down to: throttle response = smaller 12-14cm wastegated exhaust housing, more fuel = larger (wg or not) 16 exhaust housing, lots-o-fuel = new turbo.
As for the exhaust housing sizes:
For the same compressor, increasing the size of the exhaust housing will... ... increase spoolup time, decrease throttle response, make more bottom end and acceleration smoke, require more rpm and load to produce the same boost as a smaller housing, flow more exhaust gas, lower EGT when under load such as towing (better drive pressure), increase EGT under low throttle, operate more efficiently under high loads, allow heavier fueling while keeping EGT under control.
Decreasing the size of the housing will: decrease spoolup time, increase throttle response, reduce low end and acceleration smoke, make more boost at lower rpm, flow less exhaust gas, increase EGT under high load (excessive drive pressure), decrease EGT under light load, operate more efficiently when under lighter loads such as driving around town and cruising down the highway.
Hope this helps
Note: If you have any questions/comments please PM me and I'll either edit this post or we can start a new thread on this subject. Don't want to clutter up this thread with discussions.
Cheers,
Sean