Mark and JR, you're both absolutely right about the truth, but unfortunately this is one of those things we'll never get the truth without more than one eye witness account. It almost becomes a "PEOPLES COURT" kind of thing, with choices based on what little info is available with ruling as follows,
1. Complainant proves case, win
2. Defense proves case, win
3. No one proves case, no one wins
4. And for this forum purpose, dont care.
I'm not sure the old man owner will ever respond and after me posting, I decided to go to the campground website and check it out. In order to see rules, you have to sign up to get an account... big negative as far as campgrounds go.
So, unless this campground is located at or near a national park or major attraction, I'd have to rescind my previous comment about staying there.
For me the preposance of evidence both complainant and the witness mention is the Sheriff's Deputies involvement... unless they are corrupt. I dont see them being this involved, especially multiple ones for jusr receiving a pkg. I could be wrong...
Cheers, Ron