Here I am

New ATS Intake manifold opinions?!

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

New 3 piece exhaust manifold?

k&n filter

I went ahead and merged the threads floating arround on this and brought it here under one roof. :cool:



It has a wicked :cool: Cool factor that is for sure. However I cannot see it "Flowing" more air as you STILL have a 3X3 Square opening at the plenumn. I do see a "Last Chance" For expansion tho which allows the incoming air charge to expand one last time before entering the air plenumn making for a slightly more dense (Hence Cooler) air charge.
 
Has anyone ever removed the grid heaters and run a dyno test? The grid has to cause "some" restiction to airflow.

Mike
 
Just got the Arc-Flow(I call it the "DRUG PUSHER") installed on the ole' 95... . all I have to say is :--) . Don't know about dyno numbers as of yet, but I will tell you that it has taken away a majority of my turbo surge when shifting. It feels like it wraps out quicker, but my seat O' pants meter went bye bye LONG time ago. I'll keep everyone update, if you guys keep on me about giving up the info. :-laf
 
Last edited:
I would think a vendor such as Piers or anyone else who upgrades, O-rings and sells heads on a frequent basis could set up a process where they could mill off the intake plenum, drill the head and install a fabricated intake such as the one Banks designed. Something like this would probably be $1000ish or more but I'd bet you if someone did it up there would be takers, and once you get a few going the prices would come down.



I know a few issues ago in TDR Mag someone did a test with 6 EGT gauges on a 12-valve and showed a considerable balance in EGTs between cylinders going to the Banks Twin Ram. While a mod like this wouldn't necessarily give you more HP, it will ALLOW more HP. I saw something where Banks took a stock Cummins and powered it to meltdown, then took another and did the intake mod and did the same thing, but it took a lot more HP to kill it due to improved intake air flow.



Vaughn
 
Why not just laser or water cut a nice aluminum flange and make a sheet metal intake like all the gas race cars. Use thicker material obviously. Instead of a HUGE plenum, go with a tapered design since diesels dont see the RPMS of gas/alcohol race engines.
 
3 and 1/4 was my quote from ats. And The manifolds are available in clear coat metal finish, white powdercoat, black powdercoat. I like it, but i'm still buying hp and will add finishing touches later. :cool:
 
Arc-Flow™ Intake Manifold w/ pre-tapped ports for gauges/water injection/other

Black Powdercoat Finish 1994-2005 INT-D-98-05-Black $325

Arc-Flow™ Intake Manifold w/ pre-tapped ports for gauges/water injection/other

White Powdercoat Finish 1994-2005 INT-D-98-05-White $325

Arc-Flow™ Intake Manifold w/ pre-tapped ports for gauges/water injection/other

Metal clear-coat Finish 1994-2005 INT-D-98-05-Metal $325



http://www.atsdiesel.com/products/products-dodge-prices. asp



The BAnks Is Cheaper



DM
 
Last edited:
Any dyno results with this yet?????

Nobodies tried before and after with this thing yet? Ats has any #s yet if any?
 
I just don't get it. some folks talk bad about banks high ram. yet as soon as they see ats style of the high ram . every one wants one.
 
Because it doesn't say Banks on it, that's why!! I just bought a spare stock one to start polishing on, don't really think either one is worth the price vs gain:D
 
Last edited:
Proof vs. Thoughts and Feelings

It is so nice to see that so many of you "think" and “feel” a lot when it comes to aftermarket performance parts and are able to share your "feelings" about the parts and their makers.

After having been a part of this website since November, it is sad to see that many of you like to share your "feelings" or "thoughts", but there is little to no hard evidence when it comes to performance output of aftermarket parts you either love or hate. Thoughts and feelings are irrelevant when is comes to performance, which has to be proven with cold hard numbers, either some hard test data from dynos, or in the case of this intake manifold, flow-bench data.



KSmid heard that the “… Banks design doesn't gain any hp. Anyone have this new one yet. Any hp gain or hard info. on this”. At least ToolManTimTaylor offered some insight into this question, but there is no proof to his statement. Flow bench data, dyno results or driving performance data would be a really good thing here to prove your point!



Vaughn MacKenzie’s contribution is truly valuable: “My guess just looking at the ATS intake is it's a better design than the Banks. It doesn't flare open to a large cross section then cone down again to enter the grids spacer like the Banks does. To me Bank's design would induce turbulence. There have been mixed results with the Banks intake, some have lost HP with it. ” Guessing is always a really good thing when it comes to engineering issues. What proof do you have that the Banks design “would” induce turbulence? Are you an expert in fluid dynamics with an engineering degree to back it up? Or do you have test results to back up your thought? What about those mixed results you are talking about. Where are these results coming from? What data do you have to prove your point?



Thank you to RAndrae for asking the important question of proving your point. Darkhorse, thank you for providing valuable feedback and keeping feelings and thoughts to a minimum.



A “thank you” to the few of you who back up your statements with hard data and keeping your feelings to a minimum. Proving your point for or against aftermarket performance products is only accomplished with hard data from either dynos, flow benches, or even fuel consumption/driving logs. This is where the rubber meets the road. This is the only way credibility is earned or lost when it comes to performance or engineering related issues.
 
On the other thread that I referenced earlier a before and after test was done showing a 20 HP increase for the Banks intake, 30 minute lapse for installation.
 
Bugracing said:
It is so nice to see that so many of you "think" and “feel” a lot when it comes to aftermarket performance parts and are able to share your "feelings" about the parts and their makers.

After having been a part of this website since November, it is sad to see that many of you like to share your "feelings" or "thoughts", but there is little to no hard evidence when it comes to performance output of aftermarket parts you either love or hate. Thoughts and feelings are irrelevant when is comes to performance, which has to be proven with cold hard numbers, either some hard test data from dynos, or in the case of this intake manifold, flow-bench data.



KSmid heard that the “… Banks design doesn't gain any hp. Anyone have this new one yet. Any hp gain or hard info. on this”. At least ToolManTimTaylor offered some insight into this question, but there is no proof to his statement. Flow bench data, dyno results or driving performance data would be a really good thing here to prove your point!



Vaughn MacKenzie’s contribution is truly valuable: “My guess just looking at the ATS intake is it's a better design than the Banks. It doesn't flare open to a large cross section then cone down again to enter the grids spacer like the Banks does. To me Bank's design would induce turbulence. There have been mixed results with the Banks intake, some have lost HP with it. ” Guessing is always a really good thing when it comes to engineering issues. What proof do you have that the Banks design “would” induce turbulence? Are you an expert in fluid dynamics with an engineering degree to back it up? Or do you have test results to back up your thought? What about those mixed results you are talking about. Where are these results coming from? What data do you have to prove your point?



Thank you to RAndrae for asking the important question of proving your point. Darkhorse, thank you for providing valuable feedback and keeping feelings and thoughts to a minimum.



A “thank you” to the few of you who back up your statements with hard data and keeping your feelings to a minimum. Proving your point for or against aftermarket performance products is only accomplished with hard data from either dynos, flow benches, or even fuel consumption/driving logs. This is where the rubber meets the road. This is the only way credibility is earned or lost when it comes to performance or engineering related issues.





:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
I don't have either of these products, but I did read a post about 9 months ago where somebody did a before and after dyno with the Banks High Ram intake. The results of the dyno after installing it were lower than using the stock intake horn. Whomever posted the information called Banks and they explained that it was only designed to work with "their" box.



I like the ATS better because it has the pre drilled and tapped ports. :D
 
Just installed the ATS intake manifold on my 04. 5. Man, what a PITA it was! :{ . Took me at least 3 hours from start to finish. Removing the OEM manifold took some time; the grid heater wouldn't come loose from the manifold so I had to fight that. Then, there were no instructions included so anything unusual that came up was guess work. For example, on the OEM manifold there's a post that a wiring harness bolts to. There's nothing on the ATS for that. I spent some time searching ATS's website tiring to get answers but to no avail. Couldn't believe that the oil dip stick was placed so far from the OEM location. I had to re-bend it so that it wouldn't hit the back of the manifold and in the process I broke the handle off. :mad:. The OEM bolt for the dip stick wouldn't thread in so had to dick with that for about 45 minutes. Last but not least the freaken thing doesn’t line up with the pipe coming out of the intercooler. I mean IT'S WAY OFF! What a POS this thing is. I'm very surprised at ATS for putting out something so poorly designed.
 
Cliffman said:
I'm very surprised at ATS for putting out something so poorly designed.

Hmmmm. I was thinking about picking one of these up in the near future just because. Maybe not. Sorry to hear that.
 
Back
Top