Competition P-Pumped 3rd gen

[DHRA]

I've been called a smart A. . a time or two but I mean come on comp, your making this too easy. It's really hard to take someone seriously that sticks his foot in his mouth that many times.

I'm definitely a smart ***, a lot less now that I'm older, but you are right, and that is one of the best foot-in-mouths I've seen in a long time. :-laf

 

[justinp20012500]

What do you mean?

Look at the Industrial Injections almost 700 hp on diesel only with a single turbo



Brady has a 688 HP number listed in his sig. I have heard that Dr. Gas runs a pretty healty correction factor.

 

[COMP461]

And you assume this because. Quite a few people on here use that dyno, and its has almost no correction factor. It’s really irrelevant, as the number on the score board will be the only factor that really matters. And speaking of foot in mouth disease, some time that leaves you on hoofs alone maybe Eric ?

 

[CMNS PWR]

Chump just got #ad

 

[justinp20012500]

Quite a few people on here use that dyno, and its has almost no correction factor.

Just spoke with BJ, ASE corrected to sea level.

 

[banshee]

And you assume this because.

The bottom of the graph has "SAE 1. 20" on it. In other words, 573 uncorrected.

 

[DHRA]

And you assume this because. Quite a few people on here use that dyno, and its has almost no correction factor. It’s really irrelevant, as the number on the score board will be the only factor that really matters. And speaking of foot in mouth disease, some time that leaves you on hoofs alone maybe Eric ?

How's that? Not insuating that I'm impervious to such behavior , but I'm interested in what you may have in mind.

 

[Timbeaux38]

1. 20? Where were they dynoing? Summit of everest? :-laf

 

[justinp20012500]

1. 20 I would assume to be a pretty heafty correction factor.



The dyno is located in Sandy Utah. The elevation is 4700'



The dynos around here that are uncorrected humble many people. I like to dyno on the m250 load dyno.



The dynos at the last edge dyno day were run uncorrected. The correction factor they should of ran was about 1. 15 - 1. 16.





Justin



Greg, I am not trying to question that the CR will be King in the future. I am just trying to make sure we get all the facts straight.

 

[Turbo Thom]

Greg... ... ..... You answered your own question. I't ain't here yet.

 

[COMP461]

Still not sure whose dyno that was being referring to, but SAE dyno correction factors are totally bogus with reference to the type of engines we run. This is why you will see big correction factor and big numbers in very poor density altitude. I have read a SAE paper a while back on this very subject, and it had referenced that the correction factors should be divided up in supercharged engines and that these should be segregated between high and low boost engines , and with respect to the amount of air temperature difference in intercooling effect.



All said I would say you should use about 10% on the correction factor on diesels above 40 psi, or there about, and maybe about 25 % on engines below that.



http://www.sdsefi.com/techdyno.htm



here is a good paper , I just found,



On CR I’m not speculating, but have been involved in brings this to the Diesel drag racing its is not and never will be for sale. I feel its safer then a P-pump, and will make more useable power. Just because a pulling truck can make 1500 hp doesn’t mean it will in a drag race. The question is do you want to make numbers, and speculate about what if’s , or do you want numbers on a scoreboard.