AClayton - before you start throwing around legal terminology, you might want to check your definitions. (1) What you are accusing salty of is libel, not slander, and (2) slander/libel are false statements made to defame another.
As far as we can tell, salty is not lying about anything. He isn't "slandering" anyone. He is giving us a factual recount of his experience with Standard Transmission. Get off his back already.
As far as we can tell, salty is not lying about anything. He isn't "slandering" anyone. He is giving us a factual recount of his experience with Standard Transmission. Get off his back already.
Not one thing was said BY ME..... to scorn Salty!I was merely backing up the post that Joe wrote.
I understand that Standard may not have done the best job possible of communicating with Salty and he did what many would have done and simply took his business elsewhere. There are two sides to every story however,and we know one side... . until we know Standards side,I would suggest NOT slandering a Company that has a great reputation on a public forum. And I'm not speculating that Salty did anything to deserve that kind of treatment,but he did take his business elsewhere and that should be punishment enough for Standard. Slandering a reputable,American owned Company in the poor sights of our economy,on the internet is a futile punishment for lacking in communication. If this Company did very poor work and refused warrantyfor some reason or another... . yeah,I could see posting about it on a public forum.
I hope I cleared up my original post.
Alan