Objective; but still all just personal opinion on my part
You're definitely in the minority. Most people have better luck with their Dodge than they do with brands X and Y.
george
Actually George,
So far the responses to this thread do not support that statement. IMO, all 3 big US pickup manufacturers have substituted gadgetry for quality as the years have progressed. Sacrificed function for form.
Not all changes have been for the worse (I'll think of
something better if I try hard enough). But certainly many of them have been change for change's sake alone. Others, like unit bearing hubs and balljoints, for instance, have been a downright deliberate step backwards for profit sake. Still others, like the CAD system, have sacrificed tremendous strength and reliability for 1/2 ton lazy-driver convenience while adding to the cost of production and maintenence/repair. All 3 manufacturers are guilty as charged of these follies, imo.
For the '96 model year, and all I consider here are 4x4's, I believe my Dodge is the second best pickup (not engine or drivetrain) made that year since I believe Ford was still utilizing an almost-real Dana 60 with live bearing hubs, lockouts, and true dana 60-sized axle shafts. They blew it with balljoints, though, but did use tried and true leaf springs and dual piston calipers. That beefier and more reliable frontend alone puts it head and shoulders above a same-year 4x4 dodge for strength and durability. GM isn't even in the running due to their pure-crap IFS alone.
All in all, I feel if Dodge had kept the super-tough
real Dana 60 and simple front suspension of their 1st gen and simply put it under the new 2nd gen, they (and I) could lay claim to the all-time best all-round heavy-duty factory 4x4 pickup, imo. And as long as I'm wishing in one hand, they needed to keep the NP205 as well. It would still have weaknesses like the lousy plastic dash, brake and fuel lines, headlights, and fuel sender, but I could live with them as they are relatively minor one-time fixes.
As for creature comforts and looks, I have no preference among any brand anymore as they are not as important to me and all three manufacturers have over-emphasized those aspects to a fare-thee-well instead of focusing on what is truly important in a heavy-duty pickup.
I also believe Ford continues to understand better than GM or Dodge what a working truck needs to be and offers more beef with less emphasis on what I consider "1/2 ton frills" in their F450 and F550 lineup. Ford offers the new Dana Super 60 front axle with Dana 70 size components, for instance (still doggone balljoints, though...

) proving they understand what a diesel's truck platform should be. I personally consider all 1/2 ton pickups to be cars with a big open trunk. Like an suv. Built 90% for transportation and only 10% work at best. I have zero interest in them. Let the urban cowboys have them.
I'll also confess right now that early-98 is the last Cummins I would own. Unless it has wings and Mach 2+ capability, I despise vehicles that rely on computers. For that reason, I have not even ventured into a new-truck showroom for over a decade and cannot claim good knowledge of them. Show me a computer under the hood and I'm done looking and will double my money by folding it in half and putting it back in my pocket. And no overpriced gee-whizmo gizmo or styling package is going to entice me.