Well, I hope someone from DC does monitor this forum. Because a warranty should not be a subjective thing. A part should be under warranty the same at Dealership A as it is at Dealership B. That would instill more consumer confidence in the dealerships.
This post was posted to show that a dealership would encourage unethical practices regarding performance enhancing products to make a sale. And that if the consumer (me) was not educated, mostly by this forum, they (me) would be in for a big suprise on their visit for a failed VP44. Because all of us know that the masses are out their unaware of most of these inconsistancy and issues with the trucks. It goes back to all the trucks going down the road with a failed lift pump or without at least a post Turbo EGT. These people look to the dealership to be the authority but we all know that some dealerships will work with you and others will not.
I think that DC should have a warranty claim agent in every dealership to monitor the enforcement of the warranty item or answer questions from prospective owners or current owners. The waters are certainly gray as to what is voided upon what change. For example my truck has a BHAF on it, does that void the warranty on the entire air intake all the way through to the turbo? Depends on the dealer, and sometimes the day your truck is there.
So I knew better and since I did I pushed the the remaining warranty claims in their selling pitch. The next person looking at that truck may not be educated regarding these issues, so they rely upon the information given to them by the dealer. And I have seen many people get flamed on this board for being unethical by removing certain items before taking their truck in for warranty work. This post shows that some dealerships condone that practice.
---Doug