Originally posted by Tejas Deezul
Here you go, here is a list of all API licensed oil:
http://eolcs.api.org/DisplayBrandNames.asp
here you can search by different catagories:
http://eolcs.api.org/
Just look for API service catagories that meet or exceed your engine requirements. For example, catagory SG you could use SH because SH meets SG specs and then some additional requirements.
Remember, as Jim Van from Amsoil admited, "The API donut only designates that minimum spec’s are met... " Any oil that is not API licensed gives you no assurance that the minimum requirements are met.
My 01 requires CF-4/SH so anything meeting that or higher will work and meet warranty requirements.
Hope this answers your question.
Your constant harping against Amsoil in this thread is off-topic, and probably should be considered brand-bashing.Greetings all, I have a question for the membership or any visitors that are using sythetic oil with by-pass filtration and that is what kind of milage are you getting between oil changes and do you believe the added cost is worth the investment? Thanks in advance
Originally posted by fest3er
The reason no one can produce such a list is quite simple. "API Certification" applies only to lubes intended for use in gasoline engines.
Amazing, guess the "API SERVICE CF-4/SH SAE 15W-40" is not intended to steer you to API certified oil????? Does Amsoil conform to API CF-4/SH???? I dont think so. (2001 owners manual, page 197, "Use ONLY oil conforming to API Service CG-4 or CH-4", does Amsoil have the API doughnut on it's bottle?) The API doughnut is shown on page 197 in the owners manual.
Considering Amsoil's reputation for producing high quality lubricants that exceed published minimum specifications, the trust they have earned with that reputation, and their diligence in maintaining that reputation (by continuing to produce very high quality lubes), I will gladly trust Amsoil when they say their lubes exceed the applicable specification(s).
I DO NOT accept any companies endorsement of it's own product.
I personally don't care what oil anyone wants to use. If someone wants to use Amsoil lubes, fine. Should he choose to purchase it from me, eve better (for me). If he chooses to use petroleum-based lubes, that's fine, too.
I feel the same way and have stated that before, I just think owners should be informed as to non-API certification
This thread started out as a question from Doc Nielson: Your constant harping against Amsoil in this thread is off-topic, and probably should be considered brand-bashing.
Why is it when anyone says a contary word regarding Amsoil it suddenly becomes brand bashing? All I said was that Amsoil does not meet the reqirements of the owners manual, and users have a right to know. Why does that strike fear in the hearts of Amsoil delers/users?
I would appreciate (as I think most TDR readers would) if you would stop trying to mislead TDR readers, whether such misdirection is intentional or inadvertent.
Mislead? I'm not the one who said "Amsoil meets the specs whether it says so on the bottle or not" Again, all I said was it didnt comply with API minimum specs.
Doc Nielson asked a legitimate question, and I believe he received several legitimate answers. Everything else, including this post, is off-topic.
Threads frequently go off topic, why does this worry you?
Moderators, this thread should be locked, and all off-topic posts (inluding this one) should be deleted from it.
Why? Does the truth hurt? What is the harm in a discussion? Do you want TDR Admin to take sides and censure the opposing viewpoint? This would be a sad day if Admin did that.
All of the off-topic 'discussions' have been previously flogged in other oil war threads, and none of them answer the original poster's question.
Neal
Originally posted by Tejas Deezul
(2001 owners manual, page 197, "Use ONLY oil conforming to API Service CG-4 or CH-4", does Amsoil have the API doughnut on it's bottle?)
My point exactly. It says '... conforming to... '; it does not say 'tested by API and licensed to bear the API Service symbol'.
I DO NOT accept any companies endorsement of it's own product.
Cool! Great for you! But we really don't need to hear you say it over and over and over and over and over.
I feel the same way and have stated that before, I just think owners should be informed as to non-API certification.
Again, diesel engine lube cannot be API Certified; such certification applies only to gasoline engine lubes.
Why is it when anyone says a contary word regarding Amsoil it suddenly becomes brand bashing? All I said was that Amsoil does not meet the reqirements of the owners manual, and users have a right to know.
I think it becomes brand-bashing when one repeats the same mis-information over and over, when one continues to twist semantics, when one continually uses the wrong terms, even when the error has been calmly pointed out.
Mislead? I'm not the one who said "Amsoil meets the specs whether it says so on the bottle or not" Again, all I said was it didnt comply with API minimum specs.
And you determined this how? You executed the API suite of tests on the Amsoil diesel engine lube? You obtained the results from a company that executed the tests?
Why? Does the truth hurt? What is the harm in a discussion? Do you want TDR Admin to take sides and censure the opposing viewpoint? This would be a sad day if Admin did that.
Truth is truth. Unfortunately, you seem to ignore enough of the truth presented here. Why? I don't know; perhaps you just like to argue?
... perhaps it is the loss of sales that drives some to get irate?
No, sir. It is not loss of sales; I have almost no sales of Amsoil - mostly because I'm an engineer, not a salesman. Rather, it is the repeated statements of incorrect information as fact that I find ... bothersome.
This is a discussion, nothing more. No harm is done except some may decide to buy over-the-counter oil and others will buy Amsoil through it's dealer network. Perhaps no one will change his/her mind. ...
So why then do you insist on repeating yourself ad infinitum? Once or twice to make your point I could understand, but to constantly harp on the fact that Amsoil is not API Certified is counter-productive. And you constantly ignore the fact that I agree completely with you - that Amsoil is not API Certified and that Amsoil diesel engine lube has not been tested by API, thus may not bear the API Service symbol. And you keep ignoring the fact that *no* diesel engine lube is API Certified, nor can they be.
Normally, a discussion involves one side speaking, the other side listening and considering the points made, then responding whilst the one side listens and considers the counter-points. And so on, back and forth, until common ground is reached, or it is agreed to disagree and end the discussion.
[/B]
Neither have I. Never heard of anyone being denied warranty over it either. In fact a friend of mine bought in 12 qts of Amsoil to the dealer to replace the Amsoil they were going to dump while fixing a leak- under warranty and no problem.Originally posted by klenger
Entertaining, but seems kind of silly since I don't remember ever hearing about any kind of oil related failure from anyone on the TDR, regardless of what kind of oil they use.
Originally posted by illflem
... Aren't these diesel rated oils? CF-4,CG-4,CH-4,CI-4/SL
if so they appear to be certified
http://eolcs.api.org/DisplayLicenseInfo.asp?LicenseNo=0777 and
http://eolcs.api.org/DisplayLicenseInfo.asp?LicenseNo=0091
Originally posted by fest3er
They are not API Certified. They have been tested by API (or its designates) and found to meet the service specifications, and thus have been licensed to display the API Service symbol (the donut).
Again, only lubes designed for gasoline engines that have been tested by API (or its designates) and shown to meet the specific International Lubricant Standardization and Approval Committee specification(s) are licensed to display the API Certified symbol (the starburst).
API use "API Service" and "API Certified" to indicate tested conformance to completely different specifications. The terms are not interchangeable.
And related to the "API Service" mark, lube from some early production point was tested, found to conform to the API service level, and licensed to display the 'donut'. Random samples are tested in the future to verify continued conformity. However, very little of the oil is actually tested for conformance, so even if the jug of lube bears the 'donut', there is no guarantee that it actually does meet the spec; that is, one is still relying on the integrity of the producer and its processes to produce a conforming lube - this is the same 'faith' we Amsoil users have in Amsoil's integrity and processes.
Neal