TFucili
TDR MEMBER
I do, and I didn't really share that concern, though I did buy into Cummins' "simpler is better" BS about the ill-fated heavy EGR concept, and their gloating about meeting the 2010 standard in 2007. We all know that was a bust. But there is a distinct difference between resistance to change or fear of new complexities versus a well documented dud of a component. I simply don't believe they needed the CP4 for higher rail pressure. Look at a CP3 and a CP4 apart on a bench, and you don't have to be an engineer to see which pump is more robust. I think it is mostly about the substantial cost difference, and also their zeal to save weight. On that note, I'd be interested to know the weight of the CP4 vs CP3.Remember everyone freaking out about the DEF trucks???
Heck, I will likely be ordering a 2019 in due time, and I have to say the CP4 is at the top of the totem pole of my concerns with the new 6.7. I've been a beta tester before...